Thought for the Week

 

31 January – The Presentation of Christ

 

Collect

Almighty and ever-living God,

clothed in majesty,

whose beloved Son

was this day presented in the Temple,

in substance of our flesh:

grant that we may be presented to you

with pure and clean hearts,

by your Son Jesus Christ our Lord,

who is alive and reigns with you,

in the unity of the Holy Spirit,

one God, now and for ever. Amen.

 

Readings

Malachi 3, 1 – 5  

 

Psalm 24, 7 – end      

 

Hebrews 2,  14 – end

 

Luke 2, 22 – 40      

 

 

 

“Down with the rosemary, and so

  Down with the bays and the mistletoe;

  Down with the ivy, holly, all,

  Wherewith ye dress’d the Christmas Hall.”

 “Ceremony on Candlemas Eve”     A poem by Robert Herrick

 

 

Today is Candlemas. Also called The Feast of the Presentation of Jesus, The Feast of the Purification of the Virgin and the Meeting of the Lord. In the Church of England it’s a principal feast day, and in many western churches marks the end of the Epiphany season. But why Candlemas? 

 

A bit of history. The name Candlemas comes from the practice in which a priest blesses beeswax candles for use throughout the year by sprinkling with holy water. It is one of the most ancient feasts of the Christian calendar, with references to it going back to the first half of the 4th century. As Candlemas depends upon the birth of Jesus for its date, it falls 40 days after Christmas. All other so-called Holy Days depend on Easter, and as that is a moveable feast it follows that all other Holy Days are as well. There is some dispute over the name Candlemas and the carrying of candles. Pope Innocent XII believed it to be an alternative to Roman paganism. It appears that in a sermon on the subject he said it is “…because the Gentiles dedicated the month of February to the infernal gods, and as at the beginning of it Pluto stole Prosperine , and her mother Ceres sought her in the night with lighted candles, so they, at the beginning of the month, walked about the city with lighted candles. Because the holy fathers could not eradicate the custom they ordained that Christians should carry about candles in honour of the Blessed Virgin and Christ, the Light of the World. Thus what was done before in the honour of Ceres is now done in honour of the Blessed Virgin.”  End of history lesson!   

Traditionally the green Christmas decorations were taken down on Candlemas Eve and thus the poem — but Robert Herrick lived in the 17th century, and it seems the tradition has died. In the light of recent weather, it might be as well to remember an old sailor’s saying “If Candlemas Day is clear and bright, winter will have another bite. If Candlemas Day brings cloud and rain, winter is gone and will not come again” !!!!!!*****

 

Let’s look at the Gospel reading. It’s a fascinating and interesting reading from Luke’s gospel that we have today. It says something to us about ritual, it contains a synopsis of Jesus’ life, and it tells us that we all have a part to play, no matter what our age or background.

 

The story is basically about Jesus’ presentation at the synagogue and Mary‘s cleansing after the birth of her firstborn son. Both of these matters have to do with Jewish law and ritual. Clearly Jesus’ earthly parents, Mary and Joseph, were good Jews. For they saw to it that Jesus, as a young Jew, was to properly comply with Jewish law and custom, but not only him but themselves as well. On the eighth day after his birth, he was circumcised and now came the time set down for the offering of the first-born son and the ritual cleansing of Mary after childbirth.

We find in Leviticus and in Exodus the appropriate aspects of the law in this respect. Leviticus 12 requires a woman to wait forty days before going to the Temple for purification, which required the sacrifice of a year-old lamb and a pigeon, before she could take part in any Temple based ritual. If the family were too poor then two pigeons/doves were acceptable instead of the lamb and pigeon. Exodus required that the first-born male of animal and man was to be dedicated. The animal was sacrificed. Fortunately for the human, he was to serve the Lord for his life, a role that was in fact taken on by the Levites. This requirement you find in Exodus 13, and was a thanksgiving for the release from Egypt.

 

We have an insight into Jesus’ family fortunes in as much as the sacrifice was two doves or pigeons.

 

So Jesus was a good Jew from a truly Jewish family background, but in fact this is the last we hear of Jesus being involved in any Jewish ritualistic ceremony. Indeed, Jesus’ severest criticism is reserved for the Pharisees, the Sadducees and the lawyers, since this group were perceived by the rest of the population to be the interpreters of the law. They applied the law ritualistically, without compassion, and it had become such that it was of itself the be all and end all and impossible to keep. The breach of one aspect meant the breach of it all. The letter of the law, the ritual of the law became more important than the purpose for which law was made in the first place. Jesus came to redress the balance — as he himself declared, he did not come to replace the law but to fulfil it.

 

Perhaps the lesson in this for us is not to be so concerned at the ritual of our worship that we overlook the faith that brings us here in the first place. Don’t get me wrong, ritual has its place. Every Christian denomination has its ritual, every spirituality has its ritual if for no other reason than the proper and orderly conduct of our worship. What we mustn’t do is allow ritual to cloud the issue of faith in our Lord Jesus Christ. Ritual, to state the obvious, does not get us into a relationship with God that he wants. This was what Christ was about; this was why he struck out at the Pharisees about the Sabbath, fasting, healing etc. etc. There is a thin dividing line between good practice and ritualism; the latter we need to avoid. I know I keep harking on about Romans 14 and 15, but they are well worth reading in this context, mainly because the differences that have grown up among Christians are ritual-based. Paul also wrote that it is circumcision of the heart that counts, not circumcision under the law. Ritual is there to serve human beings as an expression of faith, not the other way around.

 

So this presentation of Christ in the Temple was the last ritual Jesus appears to have taken part in.

 

Mary, when the angel Gabriel announced that she was to be pregnant from the Holy Spirit, acknowledged what God was doing in her and through her in her song — the Magnificat As a consequence of what she was told, she accepted the Christ child within her. She met up with her cousin, and the foetus of John the Baptist recognised the Christ embryo within Mary and leaped. John the Baptist when Jesus was baptised recognised Chris for what and who he was the one to come after who would baptise with water and with fire; and at the point of Jesus emerging from the water, God acknowledged Him as His son in whom he was well- pleased . Nathanael recognised his Lord with the words “You are the King of Israel you are the son of God,” thus.recognising Jesus before the time when Peter was challenged with the words “Who do you say I am”. A question we all have to individually answer. But we get ahead of ourselves. Today it is the turn of Simeon and Anna, Simeon as a consequence giving us the beautiful Nunc Dimittis.

 

Can you imagine this man’s excitement? He had been assured by the Holy Spirit that he would not die before he had seen the Lord’s Christ. We don’t know when this assurance was given, but it doesn’t seem from our reading that it was the day before. Before Pentecost, God gave the Holy Spirit for specific events at specific times, and here Simeon has been gifted with a special insight to recognise the Christ at the appropriate time. The appropriate time had now come, and Simeon makes the declaration that now he can die in peace, for his eyes have now witnessed the salvation, i.e. the Christ child.

 

Anna, described as a prophetess aged it seems about 84 and spending her time praying and praising in the Temple, saw the child Jesus and immediately gave thanks and spoke of the hope of Israel — recognising in Jesus the hope of all who looked to the redemption of Jerusalem. 

 

Mary, Joseph, John in utero, Simeon and Anna all, except John of course, recognising in the baby Jesus, within 40 days of his birth, the Messiah that Israel was awaiting. You would have expected joy from all of them; there can be no doubt that Mary and Joseph were filled with the joy of having their first-born son. Of course there was joy from Simeon and Anna, but that joy is tempered with the prophecy of Simeon who in effect gives a short resume of the life that is before Jesus. Filled by the Holy Spirit, with a word of knowledge and wisdom, he almost pours cold water on the event. For through the Holy Spirit, after the Nunc Dimittis bit, which is full of joy and expectation, he tells Mary that her child will be the cause of many in Israel stumbling. For Mary he reserves perhaps the cruellest blow, telling her that a sword will pierce her heart. Prophesying the pain that she would suffer when Jesus meets his death on the cross. It is doubtful that Simeon was aware of the implications of what he was saying at the time.

 

We have all age groups involved in this story, showing that it is not a story reserved for one particular section of society but for all. Whatever our age or station in life we can be part of the story — no one is excluded. The Bible tells us we can be children of God simply by accepting Jesus for what he was and is, our Saviour, our Lord. But it gets better than that, doesn’t it?  Because if we accept this Jesus as our Saviour ,we are then children of God, we are then his sons and daughters and part of his family. 

 

Mary and Joseph, our reading tells us, marvelled at what was said about their baby.

Of course what was said was prophesy and hadn’t yet happened as it were. For us it has all happened two thousand odd years ago. We now know that Jesus was a historical figure, there is enough contemporary history to confirm this fact. But do we, like Simeon, see in him the Saviour that was awaited? Do we marvel, like the mother and father, not only at what was said about him but what in fact he did then and does for us now? — if we don’t, then we have to ask ourselves where is our faith? Because that faith should leave us in complete awe. A holy awe recognising the hand of God our Father breaking into history to give us the opportunity to get back into the relationship with God that he/she desires of us through this Jesus. Amen.

 

Mel Fancy: Reader, Anglican Chaplaincy of Midi-Pyrénées & Aude

 

To return to main Thought for the Week page, click X at top right to close this window.