Thought for the Week

 

Sunday 18 October  – Trinity 19

 

Collect

Almighty God,

you called Luke the physician,

whose praise is in the gospel,

to be an evangelist and physician of the soul:

by the grace of the Spirit

and through the wholesome medicine of the gospel,

give your Church the same love and power to heal;

through Jesus Christ your Son our Lord,

who is alive and reigns with you,

in the unity of the Holy Spirit,

one God, now and for ever. Amen.

 

Readings

Isaiah 35, 3 – 6

 

Psalm 147, 1 - 7    

 

2 Timothy 4, 5 – 17  

 

Luke 10, 1 – 9    

 

 

 

Luke the Evangelist.

Omnia Gallia in tres partes divisa est” and so begins Caesar’s Gallic Wars. And everybody believes every word he wrote, and yet these words were written some 2060 years ago. Luke is a hero for me. The gospels are dismissed, by the very same people who believe Caesar, as mere myth written by people who had an agenda … Caesar, didn’t he have an agenda too? Of course he did; to influence the people back home in his favour.

 

So why is Luke a hero? Because he is the answer to the sceptics, to the doubters. Luke was a trained doctor, used to enquiry, analysing and reasoning his way to conclusions. Now, just look at what he has to say at the beginning of his Gospel. Chapter 1 verse 3 “therefore since I myself have carefully investigated everything from the beginning, it seemed good also to me to write an orderly account for you, so that you may know the certainty of the things you have been taught.". Several things stand out from that verse “carefully investigated” “everything” “orderly account” “certainty” ---a scientist, a doctor has put his trained mind to the things he writes about.

 

His feast day is today. Not surprisingly he is the patron saint of physicians and surgeons…but, peculiarly, also of butchers … as well as students and artists. He was a Greek citizen, probably from Antioch but Philippi is a thin possibility, remained unmarried and died a bachelor at the age of 84. The early church fathers such as Eusebius and Jerome ascribe the Gospel of Luke and the Acts of the Apostles to him. Since then learned minds have applied themselves to the problem and have come up with the same answer.

Luke was a Gentile, and therefore is separated from those who have been circumcised by Paul when writing to the Colossians, although he is referred to as “Our dear friend Luke, the doctor…”. Indeed Luke was a stalwart supporter of Paul and travelled a lot with him. We find references to Luke in other writings by Paul, he is referred to in the letter to Philemon at verse 24 as well as in the second letter to Timothy, our New Testament reading for today. He was not an Apostle but a close follower of Paul who refers to him as a fellow labourer for Christ. He was an evangelist and accompanied Paul on several of his journeys. In fact we know nothing of Luke’s conversion to Christianity, but we do know that he joined with Paul in 51 AD at Troas, accompanied him in to Macedonia visiting Samothrace, Neapolis and finally Philippi where he stayed for the next 8 years. He then joined Paul again at Troas and travelled through Miletus, Tyre, Caesarea and on to Jerusalem We know he stays with Paul when Paul was imprisoned in Rome, and seems to be the only one to remain with him, as we learn from 2 Timothy 4 vs.11.

 

Luke wrote his Gospel somewhere between 63 and 70 AD, and the Acts of the Apostles somewhere in the same sort of period. There can be no doubt that his inspiration came from his travels and close association with Paul. His gospel manifests itself as the gospel of the poor and of social justice and distinguishes itself from the other synoptic gospels by the inclusion of the story of Lazarus and the rich man, and “Blessed are the poor” instead of “Blessed are the poor in spirit” in the Beatitudes. Also it is only in Luke that we have the Annunciation, Mary’s visit to Elizabeth, the Magnificat, the Presentation and the story of Jesus’ disappearance in Jerusalem.

 

All that we know about Luke comes only from his Gospel and the Acts in what have become known as the “we” sections. Luke writes the Acts of the Apostles in the third person but at chapter 16 verse 10 the “they” becomes “we” until chapter 21 verse 18. The “we” begins again at chapter 27 verse 1 until the end, at chapter 28. The “we” indicating that Luke was with Paul at these times  

 

And so we have our gospel reading for today of the 72 sent out to spread the good news… If you have ever felt alone in your own endeavours in spreading the good news of Jesus Christ, of telling people of your own experience of him and what he has done for you, then turn to these verses. Here we have a group of followers of Jesus who had never been involved in evangelism before and who are sent out by Jesus to do just that. Not to friends or acquaintances or even people in their own town, they were sent out to evangelise complete strangers. They are to preach, teach or evangelise a message of peace --- just the opposite to what people wanted to hear. You will remember that even the disciples were for the whole of Jesus ministry anticipating a Messiah who was to lead the Jewish nation in revolt against their oppressors –the Romans and the Samaritans – a revolt that was expected to be by force.

 

But what was Luke about here? His is the only Gospel in which we read of the sending out of the 72 … or was it 70? We read in the other gospels of the sending out of the disciples in a similar manner but there were only twelve of them. To Luke Jesus was to lead the new Exodus, Jesus was to lead his people out of a life of sin back to their God, the God of love and of peace. And there is an urgency about this Exodus, because if the people didn’t respond to the appeal Jesus was making to them then it was going to be too late. The kingdom of heaven was not something in the dim and distant future, it was in the here and now. Luke was anxious to portray Jesus as the new Moses heralding in the new Exodus, away from a legalistic interpretation of the Law but to an interpretation tempered with love and compassion.  Away from sin and toward a relationship with the Father through the sacrifice that he, Jesus, was to make on the cross. So like Moses as he worked to move the people of Israel out of Egypt to the promised land so with Christ as he moved to get the people of Israel back into a relationship with God that he, the Father, wanted.

 

Moses you may remember enlisted the aid of 70 helpers - 72 if you count Eldad and Medad . You can read about it in the Book of Numbers chapter 11. Thus Luke had Jesus enlist the help of seventy/ seventy-two disciples whom he sent ahead to work the towns and villages and broadcast the message of peace. The message that was foreign to the people, but the message of peace and servanthood that would change the world.

 

So Jesus sends the seventy two ahead of him to be a vanguard of his message the urgency being that if they do not accept the message then it would be too late and the people would have missed the boat. Such is the urgency that they the seventy-two are not to encumber themselves in any way. No purse, no bag, no sandals, no stopping to pass the time of day on the road. Wherever they find peace they are to stay and not waste time by moving around. In towns where their message is accepted they are to stay and heal but towns where they are rejected are damned.. Jesus ministry was to the lost house of Israel and he knew that he was now heading for Jerusalem and that time was not on the side of the Jews. Either they now accepted his message of peace and the presence of the Kingdom of God or they were going to be in no better position than the gentiles, which as we know is where they ended up.

 

Why does Jesus say to the group “I am sending you out like lambs among wolves”? Because of the nature of his message, it was the same message that he himself was going to deliver and for which he ended up being crucified. It was not a message that was welcome ---peace and servanthood--- was not what the Jews wanted to hear. In fact it was just the opposite that the people wanted to hear and believe in and therefore the seventy odd were likely to be ridiculed and ostracised for their message.

 

What they found was that where the message they had was accepted they were able to carry out healing. They exclaimed that “Lord, even the demons submit to us in your name” ---- the secret there is of course “in your name”……. no point in trying to do things in our own name. The lesson in that for us is that evangelisation is up to us, conviction and conversion are the prerogative of the Holy Spirit. We tell the story we are not responsible for whether or not that story is accepted.

 

Mel Fancy: Reader, Anglican Chaplaincy of Midi-Pyrénées & Aude

 

To return to main Thought for the Week page, click X at top right to close this window.