Thought for the Week

 

11 April – 2nd Sunday of Easter

 

Collect

Almighty Father,

you have given your only Son to die for our sins

and to rise again for our justification:

grant us so to put away the leaven of malice and wickedness

that we may always serve you

in pureness of living and truth;

through the merits of your Son Jesus Christ our Lord,

who is alive and reigns with you,

in the unity of the Holy Spirit,

one God, now and for ever. Amen.

 

Readings

Acts 5, 27 – 32     

 

Psalm 2, 1 – 9

 

Revelation 1, 4 – 8      

 

John 20, 19 – end

 

 

 

 

And so we reach the end of the original Gospel of John and we have come full circle. Original end because chapter 21 was a later add on, written either by John or someone else. Verse 31 of our reading i.e. the last verse, rounds off the gospel in a complete way and John considers that he has done what he set out to do, to show, prove that Jesus was the Messiah, the Son of God. Remember the last words of Thomas ----- “My Lord and my God.”

Why full circle? Do you remember the opening of John’s gospel? “In the beginning was the Word and the Word was with God and the Word was God.” Jesus Christ was God incarnate, acknowledged at the beginning and confirmed at the end.

So the disciples, presumably in fear for their lives, locked themselves in a room. Mary Magdalene had told them that Jesus was alive because she had seen him and spoken with him. We are not told whether or not she was believed. Luke tells us that what the disciples were told by, in that version by Mary Magdalene and the other women, seemed like nonsense. Clearly, though, the disciples were afraid, and although in our reading it talks of the Jews, we can guess this means the authorities. It can be assumed that they were afraid from the moment Jesus was arrested, for they all seem to have disappeared very quickly after that event, Peter even denying his Lord three times before the public and the Roman soldiers, and his reinstatement doesn’t come until the add-on chapter 21.

The disciples, apart from being afraid, must have been very confused. They had followed this man around for the best part of three years, they had been taught by him, they had seen him as the long-awaited Messiah of whom the prophets had spoken, and they had even declared Jesus to be the Son of God, the King of Israel. Now he had been arrested, tried, convicted and hung on a cross as a common criminal, with real criminals either side of him. What were they to make of it all? They wondered what had happened, but next in John’s account is that Jesus appears before them in the locked, secure room. This is the risen Jesus, the resurrected Jesus for there can be no doubt about that, he has the marks of the crucifixion on his body. And yet he is able to enter a locked room and appear as if a ghost, which is exactly how Luke describes the appearance.

This is no ghost, for he could be touched, was able to eat and yet was able to pass through doors and appear without apparently walking or physically moving to get where he appears. This is the risen Jesus, this was the Jesus in whom heaven and earth met at his resurrection, this was the Jesus in his resurrected body and living in two worlds ------- God’s world and the earthly world. This was the Jesus of the new Exodus, something the Jews should have recognized and understood but didn’t, something Jesus spent his ministry preparing the Jews for but they ignored it, something Jesus spent his ministry preparing himself and his followers for but his followers failed to comprehend. Should they have understood what was happening, what had happened?

 

It’s true that for some time the Jews had been waiting for the Messiah, the prophets had been anticipating his arrival on the scene for a long time. Then there was nothing ---- nothing since Malachi or Joel, whichever is your preference ---- since about the 6th century BC. In the intervening period, the Jewish nation had been made subject to a variety of powers from the Persians through the Greeks, a vicious oppressive period of the Hasmoneans, and then the Romans. Not unnaturally, the Messiah was anticipated to lift the yoke of subjection to foreign powers from the Jewish back. As a consequence, he was seen by the Jewish people in terms of an earthly leader, powerful, kingly, with an ability to led the people against the now Roman oppressor. Of course, this was not what they got --- instead this man Jesus seemed the very opposite to all anticipations. Love your enemy, go the extra mile, give him your coat as well, he who would be first will be last, if you want to lead then you must be the servant of all.

 

This was not the message the Jews wanted to hear after all their years of patience, of waiting. Then to cap it all, on several occasions Jesus announced that he would be arrested, beaten, condemned to death and would rise on the third day. Well Messiahs don’t get arrested, don’t get beaten and put to death, do they? ----- and what’s all this rising on the third day?------ very strange! Especially since the Jews themselves were split about the hereafter. The Sadducees didn’t believe in an afterlife; the Pharisees did, and believed that all God’s righteous would rise on the last day as a body of the elect. That one man should die and be raised to life again with the rest of the world carrying on as before was just not in their understanding. 

 

Not surprisingly, the majority of the Jews were not impressed with this alleged Messiah. Even the disciples, when all that Jesus had predicted about himself came true, were perplexed. Peter on the first Easter morning went to the tomb found it empty and I quote “….. he went away wondering to himself what had happened.”.  We can assume the other disciples were no different from Peter, they must have all wondered what had happened.

 

Given this background, it does seem to me that poor old Thomas has over the years been somewhat misjudged, misaligned and misunderstood even. You see in our reading from John’s gospel he says, “Unless I see the nail marks in his hands and put my finger where the nails were and put my hand into his side, I will not believe it.” That Jesus was alive, the other disciples had seen him the week before, and had told Thomas. Well, Peter didn’t believe it at first when he found the empty grave but had not seen the risen Lord ---he went away wondering what had happened, not saying, «Oh, the Lord has risen just as he said he would» ; we can’t imagine the other disciples would have reacted any differently. They, according to our reading, were only overjoyed when they saw and recognized the Lord. In Luke, they were startled and frightened, thinking they were seeing a ghost --- not the risen Lord.  He showed them his hands and feet, and yet they still didn’t believe it.

 

In Mark, the situation is worse. Jesus rebukes the disciples for their lack of faith and their stubborn refusal to believe in the risen Lord. Mathew doesn’t have so much detail but does state that “some doubted.”

 

So was Thomas any different? ----- It seems to me, no. Thomas when he saw the wounds, recognized Jesus without doing what he threatened, he didn’t put his hands in the wounds but instead said  «My Lord and my God».

Once Jesus had shown himself to his followers, Thomas included, it was incredible but easy because there he was, in person as it were, to prove the resurrection, to prove that death had been defeated. Not only was there the personal appearance, but they were able also to look back on all he had said and done --- then the jigsaw pieces fell into place.

 

But what about us? ---- What about those who come after Jesus’ ascension into heaven?

 

Well of course, and unlike the disciples living through the events, we have the canon of scripture to look at, to study, we have those contemporary writings not included in the scriptures, and we are able to dispassionately reach our own conclusions. But Jesus has tremendous words of hope for those that follow on behind and accept him as their Saviour, for those that believe in the risen Lord. “Because you have seen me, you have believed; blessed are those who have not seen and believed.”

 

We are the post-resurrection people of God. Our baptism is a symbolic occasion when we go down into the waters of baptism and die with Christ to rise out of the waters as resurrected beings with him. There is a Spanish proverb that says, “All things in this world are nothing, unless they have reference to the next.” Heaven and earth meet in us, for Jesus lives in us and our bodies are the dwelling place of the Holy Spirit. Christ’s Spirit lives in us. The obligation upon us is therefore to live the lives expected of the resurrected people of God. We are in this world but not of this world, we are of God’s world and as such we are exalted to be holy as God is Holy. But the difficulty for us is the difficulty that Paul struggles with in his letter to the Romans at Chapter 7:  “for what I want to do I do not do, and what I hate I do.” “For I have the desire to do what is good, but I cannot carry it out. For what I do is not the good I want to do; no, the evil I do not want to do I keep on doing.” He ends with a feeling that I am sure all of us experience daily, if not hourly, “What a wretched man I am!” Then he asks himself the question, “Who will rescue me from this body of death?”   and answers the question with the only answer there can be, “Thanks be to God,  ---- through Jesus Christ our Lord!” 

    

Tom Wright, the Bishop of Durham, in his book, Simply Christian, writes, “God has raised Jesus from the dead and has thereby declared in a single powerful action that Jesus really has launched the long-awaited Kingdom, and his death was the moment when, and the means by which, the evil of the world was defeated at last.”

 

If that is right, and I believe it succinctly puts the argument for the consequences of the death and resurrection of Jesus, then this is something we need to be telling the world about. God’s Kingdom is in the here and now; it’s not the perfection that awaits us after death when by grace and through the death and resurrection we shall be with God in the fullest meaning of those words, but it’s the beginning.

Mel Fancy: Reader, Anglican Chaplaincy of Midi-Pyrénées & Aude

To return to main Thought for the Week page, click X at top right to close this window.