Thought for the Week

 

7 March – Third Sunday of Lent

 

Collect

Almighty God,

whose most dear Son went not up to joy

but first he suffered pain,

and entered not into glory before he was crucified:

mercifully grant that we, walking in the way of the cross,

may find it none other than the way of life and peace;

through Jesus Christ your Son our Lord,

who is alive and reigns with you,

in the unity of the Holy Spirit,

one God, now and for ever. Amen.

 

Readings

Isaiah 55, 1 – 9    

 

Psalm 63, 1 – 9      

 

1 Corinthians 10, 1 – 13

 

Luke 13, 1 – 9     

 

 

 

One of the commentaries on Isaiah provides sub-titles for the various sections of the text. The sub-title for today’s reading is    “An Invitation to Abundant Life”. There are two parts to this reading and we know them both quite well, although it is the second part with which we are probably most familiar because it is also a Canticle used in Morning Prayer. God is wonderfully transparent in this Canticle. Likening God’s interaction with people to the cycle of rain, crop growth, generating both seed and bread, and moisture returning to the heavens in the form of evaporation is a metaphor we can find very comfortable, and understandable. All we are asked to accept is that God’s thoughts are more profound than ours, but that God waits patiently to forgive us every time we stray.

 

Cling to that comfortable feeling, for the remaining lessons pick up on that mild word “stray” and concentrate on its big brother “sin”.

Given that this is the third Sunday in the penitential season of Lent,

it would perhaps be too much to expect something cheerful.

 

Examples of destruction are connected to repentance in the other two lessons, reminding us of the notion that “the wages of sin is death”. There seems to be some kind of inference that we are continually sinning, and sinning in a big way. But isn’t it a bit illogical that anyone would murder and rob and pillage and repent, then do it all over again? Very large sins are invariably also very large crimes, and murder in particular is usually, though not always, a one-time event. Most murderers do the deed out of anger, frustration or as a consequence of finding themselves in untenable situations. such as being caught in the act of robbing a convenience store. It may take them a long time to reach the stage of repentance because first they have to deal with both the circumstances and the consequences.

 

The Christian response understands justice but also asks such questions as:

What part of their life, background and circumstances has caused them to run with gangs, to desire the property of others, or to satisfy their needs by stealing rather than by working?

 

There are always many questions to be asked and answered when we want to look at big crimes, which are also of course big sins.

 

If you were a Viking, however, and part of a marauding crew aboard one of the sleek and fast Viking ships which swept down from the North, then up one of the many rivers or estuaries on England during the 11th Century, murder, robbery rape and pillage was what you were there to do. It was part of a proven successful way to make new settlements.

 

Kill off the men folk first, of course. Leaving any alive would invite revenge and attacks in the night, but removing them all, swiftly, with the club and the dreadful two-sided ax made settlement relatively easy. The womenfolk were there for the taking, the children were become tractable, the homes were there for the occupying and a new settlement would be quickly established.

 

I don’t think the Vikings considered their activities sinful, even though they did have a clear form of government and a structured society.

 

When we read lessons like those today, we can really begin to wonder what sin actually is, and things these days are less black and white than they have been in the past.

There was a raging controversy, for instance, during the Pelagian heresy that suggested that sin was actually a substance. Happily there is no truth to that idea but the controversy did help to show that there is indeed a presence of evil in the world, and that this is different in some way from sin. Sin, in effect, acquired a definition. It is defined as “the deliberate separation from God’s grace”.

 

The only problem with definitions is that they usually take a lot of explaining, and this one is no exception.

 

A famous professor of Greek, who had a lively sense of humor, used to say there was a good solution for mothers who really did not want their sons to be ministers and would rather they had become doctors instead.  Playing on the Greek word for sin he would advise these mothers to tell their friends “My son is a prominent Harmatologist”.

 

Harmatology is indeed the theologian’s word for the study of sin, but before any of you rush to take it up, remember that it is all theoretical. You do not actually have to do the sin in order to study it – in fact that is discouraged.

 

However, here’s an interesting question for you. The Commandments that Moses received became the basis for the Hebrew understanding of sin, and of course, they are also the basis for the civil laws of almost every country. You must decide if, therefore, breaking the law is also a sin.

 

Several of the prophets had long tried to explain that suffering does not come by the will of God, yet in the time of Jesus and Paul the notion that illness and misfortune were God’s punishments for sins was quite prevalent.

 

Paul seems to be in sympathy with this view, and in today’s lesson raises the historical example that many people died after the incident of the golden calf, while Moses was on Mt. Horeb receiving the Commandments from God. The legend had it that God struck down all those who had worshiped the idol. In Cecil B. de Mille’s version, you may recall, they not only worshiped the idol but also engaged in all kinds of riotous and lecherous and debauched celebration. Paul then goes on to warns the people of Corinth that they too may fall if they fail to resist temptation. 

 

And in the gospel, Jesus is reminded of an incident in which a number of Galileans were brutally slaughtered by Pontius Pilate’s soldiers while they were in the act of presenting their sacrifices, In this horrific act, the blood of the victims was mingled with the blood of the sacrificial animals.

 

Jesus told them that the sin was not that of the Galileans, but of Pilate’s cruelty – yet why, we would wonder, would the suggestion of the Galileans guilt even occur to them?

 

The answer is that blood was a powerful factor to the Jews. It represented the purity of the race, and preserving the race was of paramount importance to a people who considered themselves exclusive and Chosen by God. Their understanding of sin had become formalized and inflexible, and there was also the element of ignorance. They believed it was their own fault if their blood became defiled by mingling with the blood of animals or outsiders. The laws really were meant to preserve the race, but the people by then were taking the words of the law literally.

 

We are not entirely immune from literal understandings either.

 

We can all remember some of those “what if” questions as we were learning the rules.  These are the questions that try the patience of parents and Sunday School teachers – and to the irritation of others, some of us never quite stop asking them.

 

The people telling Jesus about the incident were basically asking a “what if” question so Jesus countered this disaster with another that he knew about. Eighteen people had died when the tower of Siloam had fallen on them. Before the tower fell on them there was nothing to indicate that they were sinners, any more than anyone else. Jesus therefore corrects a false belief. There was no reason to believe that either group was more sinful than any other.

 

We have inherited most of this history about sin, and some of the baggage that goes with it.

 

We threaten our children and each other using the kinds of retribution Paul likes to use in order to make our points and to oblige people – or the kids – to behave,

 

Better, really, that we focus upon the lessons found in Jesus’ little story about the fig tree. The landlord agrees with the gardener that the tree be forgiven its sins, if you will, and given more time, but also stipulates that it also receive care and attention and nurture

so that it has a good chance of bearing fruit at last.

 

Only if it resists all attempts to make it healthy and grow and bear fruit, will the gardener agree that it should be cut down.

 

Every person, every sinner if you will, must be given that same kind of opportunity, and God does just that.

 

 

Despite all that has been written about sin by Augustine, and Aquinas and Luther and Calvin and Zwingli, all prominent Harmatologists, the fact remains that explaining the basic definition should be fairly simple. It has to do with the conscious awareness that everyone has, one way or another, of God as creator and participant in our lives. Everyone has it, despite the infinite variances possible in the tapestry of human nature; The least educated have it and the most. And whether or not we learn more about God, or make the discovery of Jesus Christ in our lives, we all have a sense of what is right and what is wrong. Not in all the same way – not in all the same degree, not always in conformity with law, but humans need a code to live by, or a code to break.

 

Living by it is a virtue – breaking it is a sin – breaking it and resolving not to break it again is repentance.

 

The message today is to repent.

 

Is it the call to repentance we used to hear from the colorful fanatic on the soapbox on the street corner? Do the words “repent, the end is nigh” mean anything to us?  Probably not.  Still, there is a certain sense to that quaint expression. It reminds us that things as know them will come to an end, and that the word “repent” can mean such things as “review” “turn around” and “change”.

 

Therefore it can also imply pausing and taking stock.

 

During this season of Lent, I think that is what we should be doing. Locking at our lives, our relationships, our possessions, our needs and wishes. Looking at our habits, our attitudes, and at those opinions we hold dear that may be a bit off key.

 

Taking stock means being willing to make some changes, some paring down, some reform, some improvement. It means keeping the worthwhile and throwing out the shoddy and worn out.

 

Taking stock means making room for something new and refreshing and worth keeping.

 

Repentance is all these things, because it is fundamentally about resolves.

 

The Canticle reminds us, and Jesus reinforces, that God is infinitely patient, infinitely aware of us as humans who are subject to so many influences, not all of our own making or choosing, yet heir to extraordinary gifts.

 

The fig tree motif seems to be a clear metaphor: God is always wanting to give us not only the chance to bear fruit, but to give us the time and nurture to make it possible.

 

So, as Lent goes on, consider a little moral stocktaking. Then turn to God having made room for some new stuff, and invite God to fill the space for you.

 

Revd Tony Jewiss: Anglican Chaplaincy of Midi-Pyrénées & Aude

 

To return to main Thought for the Week page, click X at top right to close this window.