Thought for the Week

 

7 February –2nd Sunday before Lent

 

Collect

Almighty God,

you have created the heavens and the earth

and made us in your own image:

teach us to discern your hand in all your works

and your likeness in all your children;

through Jesus Christ your Son our Lord,

who with you and the Holy Spirit

reigns supreme over all things,

now and for ever. Amen.

 

Readings

Genesis 2, 4b – 9, 15 – end   

 

Revelation 4     

 

Luke 8, 22 – 25

 

Psalm 65   

 

 

 

One of the first things I discovered when I first came to live in France was that one could not buy chicken stock at the Supermarket.  My next door neighbor said to me, ‘well, we usually make our own.’ Then with a little twinkle in her eye added ‘but sometimes we use those little cubes’.

 

I agree, of course, that home-made chicken stock is best but still, I’m used to keeping a box or tin of good store-bought stock on hand as well. So that I can make chicken soup, among other things!

 

Our Jewish cousins put great store on the healthful and curative values of Chicken soup.  A Jewish mother will always have some on hand to fix anything from the blues to a twinge of sciatica – from the first signs of a cold to a nervous breakdown. If you’re pregnant and live anywhere near your mother, prepare for nine months of chicken soup. If you break your arm and you live anywhere near your mother, prepare for daily chicken soup until the cast comes off.

 

All the clichés, and the supposed benefits of chicken soup have spilled over into the rest of our culture as well, so much so that two authors, Jack Canfield and Mark Hansen wrote a book called ‘Chicken Soup for the Soul.’ It became a New York Times Bestseller,  and a number of ‘Chicken Soup for…… ‘ books have followed it.

 

An illustration in ‘Chicken Soup for the Soul’ shows two birds sitting on a branch. One of them is wearing a tiny parachute. The other bird says “The trouble with you, Shelton, is you lack self-confidence”.

 

There are loads of implications about people and everyday life in the two concepts of chicken soup for the body, and chicken soup for the soul. Some of them point to minor afflictions, perhaps just a malaise, or “feeling poorly” when a warm broth is comforting and settles the patient down for some restorative sleep.  Sometimes that warm and “good for you” liquid can do no good at all for a serious illness, but gives comfort anyway, and conveys the care and concern of the person who has made it.

 

In the main we can’t help catching colds, contracting ailments, having accidents or becoming seriously ill.

 

But what of our bird that lacks self-confidence?  What of people who, by contrast, are over confident? What of our many fears, phobias, exaggerated concerns, and imagined hazards?  What of those who feel immortal, the risk takers, the daredevils,  the amateur backyard stuntmen? And what of those whose active imaginations can either depress or elate them? Usually we can’t help having some of those characteristics either.

 

Our two readings for today have something to say about us, as humans, and something to say about chicken soup as well.

 

The story from Genesis is the second creation account.  There are clearly two creation accounts and by inference, there are actually three.   

 

This one is really all about Adam – and Adam is the Hebrew word for “man” so the story concerns “mankind” – or as we prefer to say these days, “humankind”.  This passage does not go as far as the celebrated fall from grace, but as in every good novel there is a set-up. When God says “You may eat freely of every tree in the garden; but of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil you shall not eat” we all know what is eventually going to happen. Knowing what will happen is a window into our own lives, for we know that what Adam and Eve do, we would not be able to resist doing ourselves.  Every child learns to passionately desire the very thing that it is not allowed to have, not because it is so attractive, but because it is not allowed.

 

What happens is not Eve’s fault.  Both entities have a part to play in the development of the plot, but both are equally to blame for the important theological truth that is at the core of the Creation story. That truth is that, although we are all God’s creatures, we have fallen. Something has gone badly wrong. God’s intentions were not fulfilled.  It is this failure to fulfill the trust that God places on humankind that leads to the redemption of all through Christ’s death and resurrection.

 

In the story, Adam is in charge. He has control over the birds and animals and is the one who gives them names. God’s intention is that Adam – or “everyman” enjoy innocence and harmony forever, being constrained by only one thing.  Being denied that one thing however, leads to the fall from grace that we have all inherited.

 

It is a case of needing chicken soup to help ease and comfort the ailment we have brought upon ourselves. God’s disappointment in Adam and Eve does not mean that they are abandoned, but changed in the sight of God. A sad new characteristic has descended upon humankind, and we call it “The Fall”.

 

The cure and comfort we desperately need is found in the Life, Death, resurrection and Ascension of Jesus Christ. It is the redemption provided by God as the antidote for our fallen state.

 

Now, looking at our short and familiar Gospel story we find Jesus taking a peaceful nap while a nasty storm blows up. This can happen suddenly on shallow lakes. The waves are short and very choppy and the wind comes in gusts from several directions, making a sailing boat very hard to control.

 

As in the Genesis story, the disciples are in charge of their own decisions. They are caught in a storm – that much they could not help. But they were experienced at sailing, they knew how to bail out excess water and they probably knew how to make a dash for the nearest shelter.  For whatever reason, they let the situation get out of control.

 

But it is Luke telling the story, and what do we know about Luke’s particular perspective on Jesus Christ? 

 

We will hear much from Luke in the months ahead, so perhaps we should know a little more about him before suggesting that this miracle of Jesus is just chicken soup for some frightened followers.

 

Luke’s gospel, combined with his Acts of the Apostles, comprise the largest single body of work in the New Testament. His accounts are enormously influential for several reasons: First, he is a fine writer and his stories are logical and well-developed.  He is clearly an author who intended to be published, and who intended his work to have a wide and varied audience.

 

Next, he includes a number of illustrations as to who Jesus is, that are not mentioned anywhere else: The stories of the Prodigal son, the Pharisee and the publican, the Good Samaritan, the rich fool, the rich man and Lazarus, the healing of the two lepers, and others.

 

Third, he introduces his gospel with a preface. This indicates that he wanted his work to be considered as literature, rather than a personal memorial.

 

Threading through his whole work is an understanding of Jesus that puts the Lord firmly in charge of every aspect of his own life – a characteristic that does not come through in the other gospels. In Luke, nothing “just happens”. Every situation provides Jesus with a chance to demonstrate the two characteristics that Luke sees in him – a kind of regal poise, and a depth of human compassion.

 

Time and again Luke shows how Jesus is always in control of situations:  when the residents of Nazareth try to run him off a cliff, he passes through their ranks and walks away: he sends a message to Herod that he will not be rushed. Balancing this control with his usual compassion, he turns aside to heal the slave’s ear while calmly debating his accusers in the garden.

 

These are the same calm and deliberate actions we see in the story today. The disciples panic, but Jesus does not. In fact, he sleeps right through the worst of the storm and has to be woken up. But why? What did the disciples expect by shouting to him that they were perishing. Perhaps they needed another pair of hands to try to control the rigging, perhaps they thought he should be awake when the boat actually sank. They certainly did not expect what happened next, for the text says that they were afraid and amazed.

 

We don’t often think of Jesus as being having a sense of humor. Yet a number of writers have claimed that he did indeed. Humor is always hard to translate from language to another, and again, there are many kinds of humor. Yet his remark to those disciples could be both serious and sardonic – “where is your faith?” he asks, having demonstrated the he is in charge by quelling the storm, and having demonstrated his compassion by saving the men in the boat. It sounds as if he might have been having a bit of fun at their expense. I wonder what they thought about when it was all over and when they were safe on the shore again.

 

Pondering it might be good for us, too. One might say, a little Chicken Soup for the soul.

 

Revd Tony Jewiss: Anglican Chaplaincy of Midi-Pyrénées & Aude

 

To return to main Thought for the Week page, click X